If you read here much, you have seen me mull over the role of women within the church. I am a member of a PCA church, and at this point, having women as officers is not an option. I don’t even know that I would be in favor of that–like I said, I have been given much to think about, and I still am thinking.
Over the course of my married life, DH and I have been members of five PCA churches, and we have seen a pattern. The elders (session) of every PCA church of which we have been members have been a pretty predictable, homogeneous group. I do not mean to demean the incredibly difficult work that they do or the huge responsibility that they carry, and I am extremely thankful for their service to their congregations. But these sessions are made up of men who are primarily 40+ year old successful business men. All make good money, have nice clothes, have a good wife, obedient kids, and a type-A personality.
Here is what Titus has to say about the qualifications for an elder:
6if anyone is above reproach, the husband of one wife,[a] and his children are believers and not open to the charge of debauchery or insubordination. 7For an overseer,[b] as God’s steward, must be above reproach. He must not be arrogant or quick-tempered or a drunkard or violent or greedy for gain, 8but hospitable, a lover of good, self-controlled, upright, holy, and disciplined. 9He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound[c] doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it.
Call me crazy, but I do not see anywhere a requirement to be a successful businessman, or a “type-A” personality. The problem I have with a session like this is that first, type-As tend to be perfectionists. And a perfectionist has a hard time seeing his own sin. I say this kindly, as a recovering perfectionist myself (although anyone who knows what my house normally looks like knows that I am not a perfectionist when it comes to housework!). When you strive for perfection, you fail to see your own shortcomings. And it can make you unmerciful toward those who do struggle. Those who are successful in their personal and professional lives have a hard time thinking with compassion. And this can lead to a legalistic interpretation of the rules in terms of church discipline.
In our Sunday school class, we have been studying how Jesus reacted in many situations. The big thing we are seeing is that Jesus looked at people. He really saw the person. Think of the woman at the well. She had clearly broken many of God’s laws. Jesus did not look at her with condemnation, puzzling over why she couldn’t get her act together, or why she kept falling for losers. He SAW her. He saw her hurts, her needs, and he offered her grace.
In contrast, I have seen situation after situation handled by PCA sessions where the letter of the law was upheld and grace was not freely given. Yes, there need to be rules governing membership and guarding the communion table, but still. What would happen if we had a session member who [gasp] thought like a woman? I’m not even saying it needs to be a woman. But someone who tends to think emotionally. Maybe a man who is not a successful businessman, but one who is artsy!
Often I hear people speculate about why women are forbidden from being church leaders (this is among those who believe this, of course). Usually they (and women are included in this) say things like, “Oh, God knew that women would react emotionally!” Or, “Women would get all emotionally involved and tend to gossip.” Why do we say things like that? Is emotion a bad thing? Is feeling compassion, weeping with those who weep, showing mercy to those who struggle a bad thing? Did God goof when he made women the way he did? Heck, no!!! Female traits–like being emotional–are a good thing. Nowhere in scripture do I see an indication that woman are less sensible, or that female traits are a bad thing. In fact, women complete men. In other words, men are incomplete. They need the sensitive, emotional balance of a woman to make them whole as a person–a complete representative of God and His nature. I am generalizing about men’s and women’s personality types, but you know what I mean.
So why would it be a bad thing to have a session that was balanced out by a few more emotional, compassionate types? I don’t know. Maybe it is human nature to be drawn to those who are successful. I mean, if the guy can handle his business well, then he can handle the affairs of the church well. It is true, we don’t want the town drunk or a recent felon running our church. But ya’ know, in spite of the list in Titus, I think it’s okay to have sinners on the session. I think it would be hard not to. But how about some people who recognize their own sinfulness and are broken by it? People who can act with compassion, because they have been down and out and know what it is to receive grace and compassion from their Lord? And who are anxious to cover the congregation with the same grace, mercy, and love.