Choices
I know it seems I go on these “Ezzo tangents” every so often. I truly am not out to get them. But things will come up on occasion in my parenting where I can’t help but go through a “then and now” scenario in my mind. It happened again recently.
DD3 and I were driving home from a trip–it was about a 5 hour drive. She was bored to tears and kept wanting to roll down the window. I said no because first, it was almost 90 degrees outside (what’s up with THAT in April??), so it was almost unbearable to have the windows down. But besides that, I have pretty bad asthma and allergies. At the moment I’m on an antibiotic, prednisone, Claritin, eyedrops, nose spray, and Qvar, just to keep me breathing well. I don’t need to encourage pollen to find me right now. So when DD3 would not heed my request to leave her window up, I locked it. She pitched a royal fit and declared that I am VERY MEAN to her.
So I had my flashback, as I was trying to ignore her cries and just DRIVE, darn it! When DS13 was 3, I was still controlling every choice he made. The old “red cup/blue cup” thing I’ve referred to before, where the Ezzos taught people to choose the cup color for their kids. The reasoning behind this was that you teach your child to submit to your choices so that you don’t have these outbursts when they don’t get their way. If they get used to making choices, then they don’t understand when you tell them no. So this trains them to accept what you say, to respect your authority and all. And when they show they are “wise” enough to handle choices, you open up the funnel and give them more choices. But ONLY after they’ve proven they can handle the freedom.
So, with DS13, I’m sure we would have never had that fit over the windows. But now, after five kids, I’m thinking, “WHO CARES???” I had a battle either way! DS13 learned artificially that he could not make choices…EVER. (We actually had to retrain his brain to trust himself and his instincts, but I’ve written about that in another blog.) DD3 is learning in real circumstances that sometimes she cannot make a choice. It means that sometimes she has public outbursts, which probably ought to embarrass me more than it does. But it isn’t like DS13 never fought for choices. He did. It was just in the privacy of my kitchen. Which was nice, because when I was out around others, he was well-behaved and people thought I was a wonderful mom. But in terms of the long-term training on choices, the only difference I really see is that DS13 learned that making choices was actually morally wrong. Always. DD3 is learning that I trust her to make good choices. And when she does not, or when I truly need to control the circumstance, I do. Either way is difficult at times, because at some point there will be a battle over a choice. It is the nature of a toddler. In fact, I believe it is how God has designed a toddler, so that they can learn about consequences and confidence and control.
Frankly, having done it both ways, I prefer the latter. I find my previous methods to be silly, mean-spirited, and more time-consuming in the long run as it requires retraining in decision-making skills later in life. The first way saves face, makes me look better as a mom and all. But is that really my goal in parenting? Um, no. I’ll take the occasional public humiliation, a few more tantrums in a store, embarrassing moments, and shrill screams from my child, but in the long run a more well-rounded individual who is confident in her worth as a person with an opinion!
April 19th, 2006 at 11:45 am
I’m all about giving choices, too. And yesterday, my daughter threw two huge tantrums, tantrums.
So I understand! I want to teach my kids about consequences to their choices when the costs are small to them.
April 19th, 2006 at 3:48 pm
Not being a parent, I will make no attempt to comment on the parenting side of this, but I do have a comment regarding logical problems with the described Ezzo method. First, I’ll quote the portion that bugs me:
“And when they show they are “wise” enough to handle choices, you open up the funnel and give them more choices. But ONLY after they’ve proven they can handle the freedom.”
Proving that one can handle freedom requires freedom. Without freedom to make a choice initially, the child cannot prove either worthy or unworthy of that freedom. So, if the parent is making all choices and forcing the child to simply accept choices, there can never be a time at which the child proves himself wise enough to handle those choices.
In this (restricted freedom) case, either the child will continue to attempt making choices of its own (which obviously would be considered “unwise”), or the child will never make any choices and so never show any “wisdom”. In the latter case, either the parents will have to retrain, as you did, or they will complacently assume that this is a Great Thing… “our son/daughter is such a wonderful example!”. If complacence sets in, then either the child will never truly grow up, or the child will grow up but learn to hide it from his parents — and either is a Bad Thing.
In any case, I don’t see a true benefit to the described Ezzo method. The whole idea of teaching children that decisions are bad is atrocious. Teaching them that decisions can be bad or good and to distinguish between the two… is that not the whole point of moral learning? (One could argue that it’s the point of all learning, but I’ll leave that for another time.)
April 19th, 2006 at 5:37 pm
Choice is so important. We all have to be allowed to make choices, both bad and good as do our kids. How else will they learn? Tantrums will occur (often in our case) but i stick in there hoping that our kids will be better off when they are adults themselves.
This is the first time I have happened across your blog. I love the design, and am enthralled by your content. i will definately be back!
September 6th, 2007 at 4:06 pm
[...] On the other hand, I think of the Ezzos and the blue cup / red cup thing — breaking a child’s sense of self by such negations as giving them the blue cup when they ask for the red one, even if both are clean and at hand. [...]