<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Would Really Like to See Roe v Wade Overturned!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chewymom.com/i-would-really-like-to-see-roe-v-wade-overturned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chewymom.com/i-would-really-like-to-see-roe-v-wade-overturned/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 01:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: you win some, you lose some &#171; Not Finished Yet</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/i-would-really-like-to-see-roe-v-wade-overturned/#comment-89984</link>
		<dc:creator>you win some, you lose some &#171; Not Finished Yet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=1414#comment-89984</guid>
		<description>[...] I meant to link to this post earlier, entitled &#8220;I Would Really Like to See Roe v Wade Overturned (But Not For the Reasons You May Think)!&#8220;  Better late than never.  I am completely with this gal on wishing that abortion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I meant to link to this post earlier, entitled &#8220;I Would Really Like to See Roe v Wade Overturned (But Not For the Reasons You May Think)!&#8220;  Better late than never.  I am completely with this gal on wishing that abortion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/i-would-really-like-to-see-roe-v-wade-overturned/#comment-89954</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=1414#comment-89954</guid>
		<description>I'm with you sister. I'm SOOO SOOOO SOOOOOO tired! I just posted a bunch of scripture that forms my voting decision. I love you friend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you sister. I&#8217;m SOOO SOOOO SOOOOOO tired! I just posted a bunch of scripture that forms my voting decision. I love you friend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/i-would-really-like-to-see-roe-v-wade-overturned/#comment-89953</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=1414#comment-89953</guid>
		<description>I can't say I disagree about the republican party's use of the abortion issue.
I also agree that overturning roe v wade won't really change much in terms of helping reduce abortions. It's really not a legislative issue at all. It's a heart issue, and to reduce abortions, we need to change people's hearts. 
Ah, but it's easier to just change the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say I disagree about the republican party&#8217;s use of the abortion issue.<br />
I also agree that overturning roe v wade won&#8217;t really change much in terms of helping reduce abortions. It&#8217;s really not a legislative issue at all. It&#8217;s a heart issue, and to reduce abortions, we need to change people&#8217;s hearts.<br />
Ah, but it&#8217;s easier to just change the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/i-would-really-like-to-see-roe-v-wade-overturned/#comment-89951</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=1414#comment-89951</guid>
		<description>I love it!  Preach it, girl!  =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it!  Preach it, girl!  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TulipGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/i-would-really-like-to-see-roe-v-wade-overturned/#comment-89945</link>
		<dc:creator>TulipGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=1414#comment-89945</guid>
		<description>Those were my thoughts on the "big picture" of your post. . .

But about the reversal of Roe v. Wade / Doe v. Bolton. . . I'm not holding my breath.  But it was a poor decision, judicial activism -- and apart from the abortion issue it should be reversed.  I appreciated McCain bringing up that point in the third debate.  I wish I could say I was surprised that Obama spoke in favor of activist judges.  On a constitutional level, I'm concerned that the continued direction of appointing judges who legislate from the bench will upset the balance of powers in a manner that will hurt the U.S. for generations to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those were my thoughts on the &#8220;big picture&#8221; of your post. . .</p>
<p>But about the reversal of Roe v. Wade / Doe v. Bolton. . . I&#8217;m not holding my breath.  But it was a poor decision, judicial activism &#8212; and apart from the abortion issue it should be reversed.  I appreciated McCain bringing up that point in the third debate.  I wish I could say I was surprised that Obama spoke in favor of activist judges.  On a constitutional level, I&#8217;m concerned that the continued direction of appointing judges who legislate from the bench will upset the balance of powers in a manner that will hurt the U.S. for generations to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TulipGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/i-would-really-like-to-see-roe-v-wade-overturned/#comment-89944</link>
		<dc:creator>TulipGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=1414#comment-89944</guid>
		<description>Cynical?  Yeah, I'd say you've got a cynical streak these days, Chewy.

&lt;i&gt;"We could decry the morals of the poor girls who are made to carry a teen pregnancy to term. We could vote against funding programs that would help the poor, single moms, claiming it is a redistribution of wealth or that they got themselves into this mess, or they need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, or whatever. . . .  "&lt;/i&gt;

That IS cynical.

I'm sure you are right about the "not in my state" sort of ugly pride.  But the people I know who are more ardently pro-life ARE the ones helping the poor, getting involved in the down-and-dirty reality of peoples' lives, embracing young women who are pregnant in the church whether the pregnancy was longed for or an unhappy surprise. . .  I've seen elders in the church standing by newly-single moms in practical ways, people giving sacrificially to both neighbors and non-profits near and far, volunteering time.

In other words, I've seen people REALLY put their money where there mouth is -- I'm not as cynical as you are.

. . .

On the other hand, I've also seen a societal move away from helping people personally, donating to private charities, being involved when they think that a "program" already exists.  The attitude of "It's not my problem, that's what the government is for. . ." is demoralizing.  And THAT is what I don't want to see develop.

. . . 

Did you see &lt;a href="http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2008/03/obama-releases.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Obama's income tax returns&lt;/a&gt;?  He itemized on his tax returns and so his charitable giving was noted.  I would want to assume he gave more casually than he reported to his accountant.  Before his books substantially increased his income, his charitable giving was a pittance.  When his income was many times higher than our families, our GROSS giving was higher than his.  (Say all you want about student loans and cost of living, I still find it shocking that he gave so very little.)  And even now, with my husband under-employed, student loans coming due, and four young kids at home, our PERCENTAGE of charitable giving is still higher than his.

Honestly, I take offense when someone talks about the poor, the disenfranchised, the needy -- and all they do is talk.  I take even GREATER offense when the same person wants to take MY money and spend it on what THEY think is important -- when they aren't themselves willing to spend their own money on those very things.  

. . .

So I guess we each have our cynicism. . . yours about the everyday people you see disregarding those in need.  Me about the hypocrisy and misuse of power in government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynical?  Yeah, I&#8217;d say you&#8217;ve got a cynical streak these days, Chewy.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;We could decry the morals of the poor girls who are made to carry a teen pregnancy to term. We could vote against funding programs that would help the poor, single moms, claiming it is a redistribution of wealth or that they got themselves into this mess, or they need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, or whatever. . . .  &#8220;</i></p>
<p>That IS cynical.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you are right about the &#8220;not in my state&#8221; sort of ugly pride.  But the people I know who are more ardently pro-life ARE the ones helping the poor, getting involved in the down-and-dirty reality of peoples&#8217; lives, embracing young women who are pregnant in the church whether the pregnancy was longed for or an unhappy surprise. . .  I&#8217;ve seen elders in the church standing by newly-single moms in practical ways, people giving sacrificially to both neighbors and non-profits near and far, volunteering time.</p>
<p>In other words, I&#8217;ve seen people REALLY put their money where there mouth is &#8212; I&#8217;m not as cynical as you are.</p>
<p>. . .</p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;ve also seen a societal move away from helping people personally, donating to private charities, being involved when they think that a &#8220;program&#8221; already exists.  The attitude of &#8220;It&#8217;s not my problem, that&#8217;s what the government is for. . .&#8221; is demoralizing.  And THAT is what I don&#8217;t want to see develop.</p>
<p>. . . </p>
<p>Did you see <a href="http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2008/03/obama-releases.html" rel="nofollow">Obama&#8217;s income tax returns</a>?  He itemized on his tax returns and so his charitable giving was noted.  I would want to assume he gave more casually than he reported to his accountant.  Before his books substantially increased his income, his charitable giving was a pittance.  When his income was many times higher than our families, our GROSS giving was higher than his.  (Say all you want about student loans and cost of living, I still find it shocking that he gave so very little.)  And even now, with my husband under-employed, student loans coming due, and four young kids at home, our PERCENTAGE of charitable giving is still higher than his.</p>
<p>Honestly, I take offense when someone talks about the poor, the disenfranchised, the needy &#8212; and all they do is talk.  I take even GREATER offense when the same person wants to take MY money and spend it on what THEY think is important &#8212; when they aren&#8217;t themselves willing to spend their own money on those very things.  </p>
<p>. . .</p>
<p>So I guess we each have our cynicism. . . yours about the everyday people you see disregarding those in need.  Me about the hypocrisy and misuse of power in government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie in Ohio</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/i-would-really-like-to-see-roe-v-wade-overturned/#comment-89943</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie in Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=1414#comment-89943</guid>
		<description>Amen.  Well said again.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.  Well said again.  <img src='http://www.chewymom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
