<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What if We&#8217;re Wrong?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chewymom.com/what-if-were-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chewymom.com/what-if-were-wrong/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/what-if-were-wrong/#comment-89809</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=881#comment-89809</guid>
		<description>I am egal and I used to be non-egal as that was all I had been taught.  I will say I see egalism as lining up more with the basic Christian principles of love, justice, freedom, etc.  I would only be non-egal if that was the ONLY possible interpretation of some text and that is simply not the case.

I am glad to hear that someone became egal from reading non-egal literature.  I study both sides, as I do not want to be wrong and I do learn from both sides.  I do admit I need to limit my exposure to non-egal teaching as it can get too depressing FOR ME to read it for too long at one time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am egal and I used to be non-egal as that was all I had been taught.  I will say I see egalism as lining up more with the basic Christian principles of love, justice, freedom, etc.  I would only be non-egal if that was the ONLY possible interpretation of some text and that is simply not the case.</p>
<p>I am glad to hear that someone became egal from reading non-egal literature.  I study both sides, as I do not want to be wrong and I do learn from both sides.  I do admit I need to limit my exposure to non-egal teaching as it can get too depressing FOR ME to read it for too long at one time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/what-if-were-wrong/#comment-89560</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=881#comment-89560</guid>
		<description>Forgive my coming in so late to the discussion.  You've had some great postings on this train of thought.  I commend the quality of your blog's exchange. In particular, I appreciate your raising the issue of possible consequences of the varying views of gender.  

Nevertheless, I suspect your analysis carries a flaw.  You assume we can know the consequences of our actions. That's a large assumption.  I fear that in far too many situations that simply isn't the case.  We don't know or cannot know the consequences.  In fact, disobedience often has results that are unforeseen and far larger than we suspect.  So even though you raise a fascinating point, it doesn't help.  Adopting one of the other of the views could be far more devastating or detrimental than you calculate.  The world is simply too fallen.    

Consequently, study the Word.  Do what you believe to be right and biblical regardless of the consequences. Solid exegesis, I argue, trumps suspected results every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive my coming in so late to the discussion.  You&#8217;ve had some great postings on this train of thought.  I commend the quality of your blog&#8217;s exchange. In particular, I appreciate your raising the issue of possible consequences of the varying views of gender.  </p>
<p>Nevertheless, I suspect your analysis carries a flaw.  You assume we can know the consequences of our actions. That&#8217;s a large assumption.  I fear that in far too many situations that simply isn&#8217;t the case.  We don&#8217;t know or cannot know the consequences.  In fact, disobedience often has results that are unforeseen and far larger than we suspect.  So even though you raise a fascinating point, it doesn&#8217;t help.  Adopting one of the other of the views could be far more devastating or detrimental than you calculate.  The world is simply too fallen.    </p>
<p>Consequently, study the Word.  Do what you believe to be right and biblical regardless of the consequences. Solid exegesis, I argue, trumps suspected results every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/what-if-were-wrong/#comment-89158</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=881#comment-89158</guid>
		<description>Hi there, I definitely have not come to start any arguments, but I would like to defend Tim Bayly in one area.  While he chooses strong words in his blog, and it may appear to many of you to be abrasive, I'm sure that you haven't met him in person.  I have, and I can tell you that there's something powerful about the way he looks at and treats all women.  He loves and serves them in a way that I have seen in very few men.

Some of you may refuse to believe that... it honestly doesn't matter to me.  Appearances can be deceiving, but I'm telling you the truth, and I would hope that you take my words as an encouragement instead of an attack, because I have no intentions of starting a fight here.  God Bless.

Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, I definitely have not come to start any arguments, but I would like to defend Tim Bayly in one area.  While he chooses strong words in his blog, and it may appear to many of you to be abrasive, I&#8217;m sure that you haven&#8217;t met him in person.  I have, and I can tell you that there&#8217;s something powerful about the way he looks at and treats all women.  He loves and serves them in a way that I have seen in very few men.</p>
<p>Some of you may refuse to believe that&#8230; it honestly doesn&#8217;t matter to me.  Appearances can be deceiving, but I&#8217;m telling you the truth, and I would hope that you take my words as an encouragement instead of an attack, because I have no intentions of starting a fight here.  God Bless.</p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jana B.</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/what-if-were-wrong/#comment-88889</link>
		<dc:creator>Jana B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=881#comment-88889</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Maggie so what more can I say?  Except thank you, Maggie for your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Maggie so what more can I say?  Except thank you, Maggie for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corrie</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/what-if-were-wrong/#comment-14870</link>
		<dc:creator>Corrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=881#comment-14870</guid>
		<description>I agree with Molly about the salad.  Yuck!  I feel like I have about 10 lbs of waste material in my lower colon.  

Anyone take a look at the Bayly blog lately?  Just read the thread "And Women shall rule over them..." and see how a woman named Joan was treated.  It didn't take long to call her a heretic and a complainer and a wolf in sheep's clothing who is trying to devour the innocent sheep with her false teaching.   

But, take a look at the heresy she was "teaching".  There is NONE.  

Honestly, I am surpised I am not "Finally Feminist".  :-)  The Bayly blog and the CCC-forum at yahoo are two places that could drive any woman struggling with feeling like she is loved and respected and appreciated over to the egalitarian side.  They are their own worst enemies.  They will stand before God and they will have to find out just how many women they drove to be feminists.  They have no love for anyone who disagrees with them on either point.

I was kicked off of both forums and I am a complementarian!  No lie.  Why?  Because I don't hate the egals and I don't tolerate mistreating my fellow brothers and sisters in Christ.  I am of the mind that the bible restricts the role of pastor/elder to males but not outside of the church.  The Baylys say that no where should a woman have a position of influence over any man.  I don't see the verses in the bible teaching this.  It is clearly speaking TO the church.  

I also disagree with how *some* define the word "submission" and what that means.   Most of it is manmade tradition being taught as biblical doctrine.  Just think of Debi Pearl's book.  

I was just thinking how thankful I am that I am a woman.   I don't gnash my teeth when either a male or female police officer pulls me over.  I submit to authority without thought of their gender.  I am not hung up on my position, my title, or that others should be submitting to me or that I am above submitting to someone of the other gender.   I would hate to go through life examining everything like this.  It must be very stressful and it must be very discouraging.  

John, I haven't read your book yet but I agree with your above comment.  It is comforting to know that others see exactly what I have been seeing.   Honestly, it gets very depressing sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Molly about the salad.  Yuck!  I feel like I have about 10 lbs of waste material in my lower colon.  </p>
<p>Anyone take a look at the Bayly blog lately?  Just read the thread &#8220;And Women shall rule over them&#8230;&#8221; and see how a woman named Joan was treated.  It didn&#8217;t take long to call her a heretic and a complainer and a wolf in sheep&#8217;s clothing who is trying to devour the innocent sheep with her false teaching.   </p>
<p>But, take a look at the heresy she was &#8220;teaching&#8221;.  There is NONE.  </p>
<p>Honestly, I am surpised I am not &#8220;Finally Feminist&#8221;.  <img src='http://www.chewymom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  The Bayly blog and the CCC-forum at yahoo are two places that could drive any woman struggling with feeling like she is loved and respected and appreciated over to the egalitarian side.  They are their own worst enemies.  They will stand before God and they will have to find out just how many women they drove to be feminists.  They have no love for anyone who disagrees with them on either point.</p>
<p>I was kicked off of both forums and I am a complementarian!  No lie.  Why?  Because I don&#8217;t hate the egals and I don&#8217;t tolerate mistreating my fellow brothers and sisters in Christ.  I am of the mind that the bible restricts the role of pastor/elder to males but not outside of the church.  The Baylys say that no where should a woman have a position of influence over any man.  I don&#8217;t see the verses in the bible teaching this.  It is clearly speaking TO the church.  </p>
<p>I also disagree with how *some* define the word &#8220;submission&#8221; and what that means.   Most of it is manmade tradition being taught as biblical doctrine.  Just think of Debi Pearl&#8217;s book.  </p>
<p>I was just thinking how thankful I am that I am a woman.   I don&#8217;t gnash my teeth when either a male or female police officer pulls me over.  I submit to authority without thought of their gender.  I am not hung up on my position, my title, or that others should be submitting to me or that I am above submitting to someone of the other gender.   I would hate to go through life examining everything like this.  It must be very stressful and it must be very discouraging.  </p>
<p>John, I haven&#8217;t read your book yet but I agree with your above comment.  It is comforting to know that others see exactly what I have been seeing.   Honestly, it gets very depressing sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chewymom</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/what-if-were-wrong/#comment-14788</link>
		<dc:creator>chewymom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=881#comment-14788</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg,

I appreciate you stopping by and adding your .02!  Like you, I'm still working out the issue in my own mind....

~chewymom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg,</p>
<p>I appreciate you stopping by and adding your .02!  Like you, I&#8217;m still working out the issue in my own mind&#8230;.</p>
<p>~chewymom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Feulner</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/what-if-were-wrong/#comment-14787</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Feulner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=881#comment-14787</guid>
		<description>I was just browsing the internet... I like your outlook on this complicated issue. I agree with your conclusion except in respects to "women pastors/elders". I do believe that would be  a grave sin. If indeed teaching is such a high calling and indeed women are created differently than men, I don't think mixing the two would have anything less than a devestating effect on God's flock... and of course, on the other end, oppression when it comes to the details of more conservative complimentarianism is a huge devestation as well. I just don't see any good scriptural evidence (so far) for women pastors. I think it's a safe bet that they shouldn't be "pastors".
It's a big issue and I don't mean to simplify it like that... blah... I probably shouldn't have posted this... I'm having trouble explaining an issue that I am still trying to work out in my own mind...

...just passing by...
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just browsing the internet&#8230; I like your outlook on this complicated issue. I agree with your conclusion except in respects to &#8220;women pastors/elders&#8221;. I do believe that would be  a grave sin. If indeed teaching is such a high calling and indeed women are created differently than men, I don&#8217;t think mixing the two would have anything less than a devestating effect on God&#8217;s flock&#8230; and of course, on the other end, oppression when it comes to the details of more conservative complimentarianism is a huge devestation as well. I just don&#8217;t see any good scriptural evidence (so far) for women pastors. I think it&#8217;s a safe bet that they shouldn&#8217;t be &#8220;pastors&#8221;.<br />
It&#8217;s a big issue and I don&#8217;t mean to simplify it like that&#8230; blah&#8230; I probably shouldn&#8217;t have posted this&#8230; I&#8217;m having trouble explaining an issue that I am still trying to work out in my own mind&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;just passing by&#8230;<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Stackhouse</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/what-if-were-wrong/#comment-14471</link>
		<dc:creator>John Stackhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=881#comment-14471</guid>
		<description>Behold, how pleasant it is to come across a Christian blog dealing with gender in a way that (gasp!) actually acknowledges the Christian authenticity of people on various sides of the matter and that (mirabile dictu!) actually engages in thoughtful dialogue without feeling obliged to defend positions with CERTAINTY and by THE CLEAR WORD OF GOD and THE COLLECTIVE JUDGMENT OF THE CHURCH and PLAIN REASON and IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH ME IN EVERY PARTICULAR THEN YOU MUST BE A NON-CHRISTIAN AND AN IDIOT AND A WOLF IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING AND--man, I'm tired of shouting... :)

Just stopping by, but thanks for important point you made in your post and for the charitable words about my little book.

Brother John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behold, how pleasant it is to come across a Christian blog dealing with gender in a way that (gasp!) actually acknowledges the Christian authenticity of people on various sides of the matter and that (mirabile dictu!) actually engages in thoughtful dialogue without feeling obliged to defend positions with CERTAINTY and by THE CLEAR WORD OF GOD and THE COLLECTIVE JUDGMENT OF THE CHURCH and PLAIN REASON and IF YOU DON&#8217;T AGREE WITH ME IN EVERY PARTICULAR THEN YOU MUST BE A NON-CHRISTIAN AND AN IDIOT AND A WOLF IN SHEEP&#8217;S CLOTHING AND&#8211;man, I&#8217;m tired of shouting&#8230; <img src='http://www.chewymom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Just stopping by, but thanks for important point you made in your post and for the charitable words about my little book.</p>
<p>Brother John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/what-if-were-wrong/#comment-14022</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 04:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=881#comment-14022</guid>
		<description>I think the whole "who's right and who's wrong" question is simply a deflection of the real issue: walking closely in discipleship with our Lord, whose Holy Spirit will guide us.

No self-proclaimed "authorities over" us are ever going to be an acceptable substitute for the Holy Spirit within us.  If God has called us to (fill in the blank here), God will equip us to do exactly that.  And if it doesn't fit in with the traditions that some would require us to follow, the One we answer to should matter more to us than those who tell us we're wrong to think that God is calling and equipping us.

Now if somebody's operating as an independent agent, outside a trustworthy body of believers, and comes up with some bizarre notion (like "I'm Jesus in a new incarnation" or "Don't pay income taxes"), that's a different matter.  But that's not what's happening when women commit to obeying God's call to leadership in the church, or husbands and wives commit to submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ.  And it's precisely such people that certain groups of Christians are calling heretics, disobedient, selfish, etc. and ridiculing and lying about in public.

And on THAT, I really don't hesitate to say they're wrong to so mischaracterize their brothers and sisters in Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the whole &#8220;who&#8217;s right and who&#8217;s wrong&#8221; question is simply a deflection of the real issue: walking closely in discipleship with our Lord, whose Holy Spirit will guide us.</p>
<p>No self-proclaimed &#8220;authorities over&#8221; us are ever going to be an acceptable substitute for the Holy Spirit within us.  If God has called us to (fill in the blank here), God will equip us to do exactly that.  And if it doesn&#8217;t fit in with the traditions that some would require us to follow, the One we answer to should matter more to us than those who tell us we&#8217;re wrong to think that God is calling and equipping us.</p>
<p>Now if somebody&#8217;s operating as an independent agent, outside a trustworthy body of believers, and comes up with some bizarre notion (like &#8220;I&#8217;m Jesus in a new incarnation&#8221; or &#8220;Don&#8217;t pay income taxes&#8221;), that&#8217;s a different matter.  But that&#8217;s not what&#8217;s happening when women commit to obeying God&#8217;s call to leadership in the church, or husbands and wives commit to submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ.  And it&#8217;s precisely such people that certain groups of Christians are calling heretics, disobedient, selfish, etc. and ridiculing and lying about in public.</p>
<p>And on THAT, I really don&#8217;t hesitate to say they&#8217;re wrong to so mischaracterize their brothers and sisters in Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Light M.</title>
		<link>http://www.chewymom.com/what-if-were-wrong/#comment-13997</link>
		<dc:creator>Light M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chewymom.com/?p=881#comment-13997</guid>
		<description>Funny, Chewy, that the Baylys were the tipping point for you. I've gotten a few emails from people who read my comments on the Bayly blog and said the same thing. It was "Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood," that textbook of complementarianism, that actually was my tipping point. I was a lip-service comp before then, but the arguments in that book were so shabby that in almost an instant, I had a blinding moment of clarity and realized egal-ism made far more sense biblically.

Molly, I have heard women leading be blamed for divorce, drug abuse, spousal abuse, child abuse, child neglect, and ... this one always cracks me up ... the rising epidemic of obesity. 

I was banned last week from the Bayly blog - for asking a question they couldn't answer. Or rather, no matter how they answered it, the patriarchal paradigm would not look like the perfect solution they claim it to be. I asked it respectfully and wanting to know how they would handle the situation - and got booted off for heresy. Of course, they were ascribing all kinds of sinister motives to my question, which is why they claimed they wouldn't answer it.

Molly, I MISS YOUR BLOG!!!! Please don't take it down, even archived it is such a blessing to so many people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, Chewy, that the Baylys were the tipping point for you. I&#8217;ve gotten a few emails from people who read my comments on the Bayly blog and said the same thing. It was &#8220;Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood,&#8221; that textbook of complementarianism, that actually was my tipping point. I was a lip-service comp before then, but the arguments in that book were so shabby that in almost an instant, I had a blinding moment of clarity and realized egal-ism made far more sense biblically.</p>
<p>Molly, I have heard women leading be blamed for divorce, drug abuse, spousal abuse, child abuse, child neglect, and &#8230; this one always cracks me up &#8230; the rising epidemic of obesity. </p>
<p>I was banned last week from the Bayly blog - for asking a question they couldn&#8217;t answer. Or rather, no matter how they answered it, the patriarchal paradigm would not look like the perfect solution they claim it to be. I asked it respectfully and wanting to know how they would handle the situation - and got booted off for heresy. Of course, they were ascribing all kinds of sinister motives to my question, which is why they claimed they wouldn&#8217;t answer it.</p>
<p>Molly, I MISS YOUR BLOG!!!! Please don&#8217;t take it down, even archived it is such a blessing to so many people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
